CÔNG TY TNHH MỘT THÀNH VIÊN XỬ LÝ BOM, MÌN, VẬT NỔ 319

• Participated in 698 bidding packages, of which 697 were won, 1 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 1.18% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 93.43% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Lâm Đồng (32), Sơn La (28), Khánh Hòa (27), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (25), Hưng Yên (23), Lào Cai (22), Đồng Tháp (20), Vĩnh Long (19), Hà Tĩnh (19), Bắc Ninh (19), Thái Nguyên (18), Cà Mau (15), Ninh Bình (14), Thanh Hoá (13), Đồng Nai (11), Tây Ninh (10), Nghệ An (10), Hải Phòng (9), Cần Thơ (9), Hà Nội (5), Tuyên Quang (5), Đắk Lắk (5), Gia Lai (5), An Giang (5), Phú Thọ (4), Quảng Ngãi (3), Huế (3), Quảng Ninh (2), Quảng Trị (2), Lạng Sơn (2), Lai Châu (1), Undefined (325)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Sơn La (28), Hà Tĩnh (19), Tiền Giang (17), Bình Thuận (16), Trà Vinh (15), Thái Nguyên (15), Bắc Giang (14), Lào Cai (14), Thanh Hoá (13), Khánh Hòa (13), Ninh Thuận (11), Hưng Yên (11), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (10), Nghệ An (10), Thái Bình (10), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (9), Cà Mau (9), Nam Định (8), Long An (7), Hải Phòng (6), Hà Nam (6), Hà Nội (5), Bắc Ninh (5), Bình Phước (5), Bạc Liêu (5), Bình Dương (4), Đồng Nai (4), Hậu Giang (4), Đồng Tháp (3), Hải Dương (3), Gia Lai (3), Kon Tum (3), Cần Thơ (3), Kiên Giang (3), Huế (3), Đắk Lắk (3), Quảng Ninh (2), Tây Ninh (2), Hà Giang (2), Tuyên Quang (2), Phú Yên (2), Quảng Bình (2), An Giang (2), Lâm Đồng (2), Sóc Trăng (2), Bình Định (2), Lạng Sơn (2), Ninh Bình (1), Bến Tre (1), Hòa Bình (1), Vĩnh Phúc (1), Lai Châu (1), Phú Thọ (1), Undefined (367)
• Has relationships with 256 Bid Solicitors
• Has competed against 5 contractors in 3 bidding packages, won 2 packages, lost 1 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 19 contractors in 58 bidding packages, won 57 packages, lost 1 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 2 bidding packages with 2 roles.