Contact Us
- 0904.634.288, 024.8888.4288
- contact@dauthau.asia
- Facebook Fanpage: http://fb.com/dauthau.info
- Messenger: http://m.me/dauthau.info
Search for investor information
Investor information
Find: 14:11 01/10/2022
Data analysis results of DauThau.info software for project owners RANG DONG LIGHT SOURCE AND VACUUM FLASK JOINT STOCK COMPANY as follows:
- Has relationships with 0 bid solicitors.
- Has relationships with 0 contractors.
- Announced 0 development investment project, of which 0 projects that have not announced the contractor selection plan.
- Announced 0 contractor selection plans with a total of 0 bidding packages, of which 0 prequalification documents have not found the investment project
- Has invited bids for 0 packages (with 0 tender notices), conducted prequalification for 0 packages.
- Published 0 quotation requests.
- Announced the results of 0 packages, and canceled bids for 0 packages (among the packages mentioned above).
- There are 0 packages with results that do not have tender notice or prequalification notice.
- There are 0 packages with results that do not have Contractor selection plan.
- There are 0 packages that have not fully posted the contractor selection results. Of these 0 bidding packages have no tender notices found.
- On average, the number of contractors participating in each package is: 0 contractors.
- Breakdown by bidding field: Goods 0%, Construction 0%, Consultancy 0%, Non-consultancy 0%, Mixed 0%, Other fields 0%.
- The total value according to the packages with valid contractor selection results is: 0 VND, of which the total winning bid value is: 0 VND.
- The savings rate is: 0%.
Data analysis results of DauThau.info software for project owners RANG DONG LIGHT SOURCE AND VACUUM FLASK JOINT STOCK COMPANY as follows:
- Has relationships with 0 contractors.
- The average number of contractors participating in each bidding package is: 0 contractors.
- Proportion of bidding fields: Goods 0%, Construction 0%, Consulting 0%, Non-consulting 0%, Mixed 0%, Other 0%.
- The total value according to the bidding package with valid IMP is: 0 VND, in which the total winning value is: 0 VND.
- The savings rate is: 0%.
Chart of total investment amount and total accumulated investment amount of the project owner
The statistical data was updated at 23:49, 12/01/2026.
(Unit: Million VND)
(Unit: Million VND)
To view full information
This investor is also a contractor. Analysis results as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 93 bidding packages, of which 60 were won, 26 were lost, 5 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 2.94% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 93.75% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Tây Ninh (19), Hà Nội (18), Lâm Đồng (11), Tuyên Quang (8), Quảng Ninh (3), Hải Phòng (3), Cao Bằng (3), Cần Thơ (3), Vĩnh Long (3), Đắk Lắk (3), Khánh Hòa (2), Sơn La (2), Phú Thọ (2), An Giang (2), Đồng Tháp (2), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (2), Thanh Hoá (1), Quảng Trị (1), Gia Lai (1), Nghệ An (1), Đồng Nai (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Hưng Yên (1), Ninh Bình (1), Undefined (3)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (18), Long An (12), Bình Thuận (8), Hà Giang (7), Tây Ninh (4), Quảng Ninh (3), Cao Bằng (3), Lâm Đồng (3), Cần Thơ (3), Hải Phòng (2), Khánh Hòa (2), Sơn La (2), Trà Vinh (2), Kiên Giang (2), Tiền Giang (2), Đắk Lắk (2), Hải Dương (1), Hòa Bình (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Quảng Bình (1), Bình Định (1), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (1), Nghệ An (1), Bình Phước (1), Bình Dương (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Undefined (14)
- Has relationships with 61 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 132 contractors in 54 bidding packages, won 22 packages, lost 21 packages, 9 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 7 contractors in 9 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 5 packages, 1 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
- Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.
Investor evaluation score
The above scores and rankings were analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which investor's capacity is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the investor...
To better understand the scoring criteria, see the following article: Investor evaluation index set
| Evaluation criteria | Evaluation score |
|---|---|
| Experience | ??? |
| Financial capacity | ??? |
| Transparency of the investor/bidder | ??? |
| Bidding efficiency | ??? |
Views: 90
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second