CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN CE VIỆT NAM

This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors CE VIET NAM JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:

• Participated in 170 bidding packages, of which 62 were won, 98 were lost, 6 are pending results, and 4 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 43.59% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 97.01% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Tây Ninh (35), Vĩnh Long (20), An Giang (19), Đồng Tháp (9), Cần Thơ (8), Hải Phòng (8), Tuyên Quang (7), Phú Thọ (7), Đồng Nai (7), Lâm Đồng (7), Thái Nguyên (6), Hưng Yên (6), Ninh Bình (5), Lào Cai (5), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (5), Hà Nội (4), Đà Nẵng (4), Cà Mau (2), Sơn La (2), Đắk Lắk (2), Quảng Ninh (1), Cao Bằng (1), Gia Lai (1), Quảng Ngãi (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Undefined (3)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Long An (32), An Giang (15), Bến Tre (8), Vĩnh Long (7), Đồng Nai (6), Lâm Đồng (6), Tuyên Quang (5), Thái Bình (5), Đồng Tháp (5), Hải Dương (4), Hà Nội (4), Tiền Giang (4), Hòa Bình (4), Hải Phòng (4), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (4), Bắc Kạn (3), Ninh Bình (3), Phú Thọ (3), Trà Vinh (3), Yên Bái (3), Thái Nguyên (3), Hà Giang (3), Kiên Giang (3), Lào Cai (3), Sóc Trăng (2), Bạc Liêu (2), Cần Thơ (2), Sơn La (2), Phú Yên (2), Quảng Nam (2), Hậu Giang (2), Vĩnh Phúc (2), Quảng Ninh (1), Cao Bằng (1), Hà Nam (1), Bình Phước (1), Hưng Yên (1), Bình Định (1), Tây Ninh (1), Quảng Ngãi (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Bắc Giang (1), Bình Dương (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Nam Định (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Undefined (12)
• Has relationships with 65 Bid Solicitors
• Has competed against 359 contractors in 151 bidding packages, won 41 packages, lost 95 packages, 11 are pending results, and 4 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 30 contractors in 42 bidding packages, won 18 packages, lost 21 packages, 2 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.