CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN ĐẦU TƯ EPT

This construction organization is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for contractors EPT INVEST JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:

• Participated in 923 bidding packages, of which 389 were won, 445 were lost, 44 are pending results, and 45 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 38.21% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 94.8% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (118), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (55), Thái Nguyên (37), Đà Nẵng (36), Đồng Nai (36), Vĩnh Long (32), Quảng Ngãi (31), Quảng Ninh (31), Hải Phòng (27), Phú Thọ (26), Đắk Lắk (24), Ninh Bình (24), Gia Lai (23), Lào Cai (20), Hưng Yên (19), Bắc Ninh (18), Hà Tĩnh (16), Lâm Đồng (15), Huế (14), Khánh Hòa (13), Tuyên Quang (13), Quảng Trị (12), Cần Thơ (12), Lạng Sơn (12), Sơn La (11), Nghệ An (10), Tây Ninh (10), Điện Biên (9), An Giang (8), Đồng Tháp (8), Thanh Hoá (6), Cà Mau (3), Cao Bằng (3), Lai Châu (2), Undefined (194)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (118), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (33), Đồng Nai (31), Quảng Ninh (31), Đà Nẵng (25), Thái Nguyên (24), Quảng Ngãi (21), Hải Phòng (18), Yên Bái (18), Bình Định (17), Hà Tĩnh (16), Hòa Bình (15), Đắk Lắk (14), Bắc Ninh (14), Huế (14), Bình Dương (13), Bắc Kạn (13), Thái Bình (12), Lạng Sơn (12), Trà Vinh (12), Vĩnh Long (11), Quảng Trị (11), Sơn La (11), Phú Yên (11), Ninh Bình (11), Kon Tum (10), Nghệ An (10), Quảng Nam (10), Hải Dương (9), Tuyên Quang (9), Điện Biên (9), Khánh Hòa (8), Long An (8), Hậu Giang (7), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (7), Phú Thọ (7), Lâm Đồng (6), Gia Lai (6), Bến Tre (6), Kiên Giang (6), Hà Nam (6), Thanh Hoá (6), Hưng Yên (6), Đắk Nông (5), Bình Phước (5), Tiền Giang (5), Hà Giang (4), Nam Định (4), Vĩnh Phúc (4), Bắc Giang (4), Ninh Thuận (3), Sóc Trăng (3), Cao Bằng (3), Đồng Tháp (3), Bình Thuận (3), Lai Châu (2), Cà Mau (2), Tây Ninh (2), Cần Thơ (2), An Giang (2), Quảng Bình (1), Lào Cai (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Undefined (214)
• Has relationships with 232 Bid Solicitors
• Has competed against 420 contractors in 809 bidding packages, won 281 packages, lost 442 packages, 48 are pending results, and 38 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 120 contractors in 234 bidding packages, won 138 packages, lost 82 packages, 6 are pending results, and 8 were canceled.
• Received 1 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.