Search for information of the inviting party
Information of the Bid solicitor
Agency code
Z110321
Agency name (full)

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN CAO SU BẾN THÀNH

Abbreviations
BERUBCO
English name
BEN THANH RUBBER JOINT STOCK COMPANY
Business Registration ID
0301150295
Address
Lô B3-1 Khu công nghiệp Tây Bắc Củ Chi, Đường Giáp Hải, Xã Trung Lập Hạ, Trung Lập Hạ Commune, Củ Chi District, TP.Hồ Chí Minh
Address (After merge)
Phone number (Old MSC)
02837907619
Fax number (Old MSC)
02837907461
Tax ID
0301150295
Approval time
26/11/2021
This Bid solicitor is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for the contractor BEN THANH RUBBER JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
  • Participated in 133 bidding packages, of which 63 were won, 62 were lost, 6 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 5.89% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 63.04% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Quảng Ninh (23), Lâm Đồng (22), Vĩnh Long (17), Thanh Hoá (13), Hải Phòng (10), Cần Thơ (10), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (8), Hưng Yên (3), Hà Tĩnh (2), Ninh Bình (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Undefined (23)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Quảng Ninh (23), Bình Thuận (20), Trà Vinh (17), Thanh Hoá (13), Hải Phòng (7), Hậu Giang (7), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (5), Hải Dương (3), Hà Tĩnh (2), Ninh Bình (1), Khánh Hòa (1), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (1), Thái Bình (1), Undefined (32)
  • Has relationships with 38 Bid Solicitors
  • Has relationships with 25 Bid Investors
  • Has competed against 165 contractors in 106 bidding packages, won 37 packages, lost 62 packages, 6 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 8 contractors in 10 bidding packages, won 4 packages, lost 5 packages, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
  • Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
Inviting party's rating score
The above scores and rankings are analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which inviting party's capability is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the inviting party... To better understand the scoring criteria, please refer to the following article: Indicator set for evaluating the capability of the inviting party
Evaluation criteria Evaluation score
Experience
???
Financial capacity
???
Transparency of the investor/bidder
???
Bidding efficiency
???
You need to Login or Register to view bidder rating scores.
Views: 58
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second