Search for information of the inviting party

Information of the Bid solicitor
Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)
vn0107298212
Complete Name of the Unit

CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN CPART

English name
CPART JOINT STOCK COMPANY
Business Registration ID
0107298212
Address after merge
Số 11, ngách 23, ngõ 383, đường Nguyễn Tam Trinh, tổ 51, Phường Tương Mai, Hà Nội
Webpage
cpart.vn
Tax ID
0107298212
Date of issue
15/01/2016
Issuing Nation
Việt Nam
Legal type
Joint Stock Company
Representative
PHẠM SỸ HÙNG
Position
manager
Date of approval for registration request
04/10/2023
Role status
Active
This Bid solicitor is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for the contractor CPART JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
  • Participated in 37 bidding packages, of which 30 were won, 7 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 43.33% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 96.92% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hưng Yên (9), Hà Nội (7), Lào Cai (3), Bắc Ninh (3), Thái Nguyên (2), Điện Biên (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Cà Mau (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Phú Thọ (1), Ninh Bình (1), Hải Phòng (1), Undefined (7)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (7), Thái Bình (5), Hưng Yên (4), Yên Bái (3), Bắc Giang (3), Thái Nguyên (2), Điện Biên (1), Hà Giang (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Phú Thọ (1), Ninh Bình (1), Hải Dương (1), Undefined (7)
  • Has relationships with 26 Bid Solicitors
  • Has competed against 17 contractors in 13 bidding packages, won 6 packages, lost 7 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 4 contractors in 9 bidding packages, won 8 packages, lost 1 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
  • Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
Inviting party's rating score
The above scores and rankings are analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which inviting party's capability is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the inviting party... To better understand the scoring criteria, please refer to the following article: Indicator set for evaluating the capability of the inviting party
Evaluation criteria Evaluation score
Experience
???
Financial capacity
???
Transparency of the investor/bidder
???
Bidding efficiency
???
You need to Login or Register to view bidder rating scores.
Views: 81
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second