CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN THƯƠNG MẠI GIA PHẠM

This Bid solicitor is also an investor. The analysis results of data for the investor GIA PHAM TRADING JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:

• Is the investor of 0 development investment projects.
• Is the investor of 1 contractor selection plans, of which 1 were self-published, and 0 were published by other entities.
• Is the investor of 1 Tender Notices, of which 1 were self-invited, and 0 were invited by other entities.

• Participated in 88 bidding packages, of which 73 were won, 12 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 54.22% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 98.88% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (40), Phú Thọ (5), Thái Nguyên (3), Điện Biên (3), Lai Châu (3), Hải Phòng (2), Lào Cai (2), Bắc Ninh (2), Đắk Lắk (1), Nationwide (1), Hưng Yên (1), Ninh Bình (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Cao Bằng (1), Lạng Sơn (1), Quảng Ninh (1), Sơn La (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Nghệ An (1), Hà Tĩnh (1), Quảng Trị (1), Huế (1), Undefined (33)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (40), Hòa Bình (5), Bắc Kạn (3), Điện Biên (3), Lai Châu (3), Hải Dương (2), Lào Cai (2), Bắc Ninh (2), Đắk Lắk (1), Nationwide (1), Hải Phòng (1), Hưng Yên (1), Hà Nam (1), Nam Định (1), Thái Bình (1), Ninh Bình (1), Hà Giang (1), Cao Bằng (1), Tuyên Quang (1), Yên Bái (1), Lạng Sơn (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Phú Thọ (1), Vĩnh Phúc (1), Bắc Giang (1), Quảng Ninh (1), Sơn La (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Nghệ An (1), Hà Tĩnh (1), Quảng Bình (1), Quảng Trị (1), Huế (1), Undefined (33)
• Has relationships with 32 Bid Solicitors
• Has competed against 34 contractors in 22 bidding packages, won 9 packages, lost 12 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 2 contractors in 2 bidding packages, won 2 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.