CÔNG TY TNHH ĐẠI PHÁT TÍN

This Bid solicitor is also an investor. The analysis results of data for the investor DAI PHAT TIN COMPANY LIMITED are as follows:

• Is the investor of 0 development investment projects.
• Is the investor of 2 contractor selection plans, of which 2 were self-published, and 0 were published by other entities.
• Is the investor of 1 Tender Notices, of which 1 were self-invited, and 0 were invited by other entities.

• Participated in 104 bidding packages, of which 61 were won, 25 were lost, 8 are pending results, and 10 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 19.72% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 96.04% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : TP.Hồ Chí Minh (17), Hà Nội (15), Lâm Đồng (9), Đồng Nai (7), Vĩnh Long (5), Gia Lai (4), Đà Nẵng (4), Đồng Tháp (3), Cà Mau (3), Khánh Hòa (3), Hải Phòng (2), Quảng Ninh (2), Ninh Bình (2), Quảng Trị (2), Bắc Ninh (2), Quảng Ngãi (2), Cần Thơ (2), Hà Tĩnh (1), Hưng Yên (1), Huế (1), Sơn La (1), An Giang (1), Undefined (15)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (15), Lâm Đồng (8), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (8), Đồng Nai (5), Trà Vinh (4), Bình Định (4), Bình Dương (4), Quảng Nam (3), Tiền Giang (2), Khánh Hòa (2), Quảng Ninh (2), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (2), Cà Mau (2), Quảng Trị (2), Hải Phòng (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Hà Tĩnh (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Thái Bình (1), Ninh Bình (1), Vĩnh Long (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Huế (1), Bắc Giang (1), Kon Tum (1), Sơn La (1), Quảng Ngãi (1), Bình Thuận (1), Hậu Giang (1), Ninh Thuận (1), Bình Phước (1), Undefined (23)
• Has relationships with 82 Bid Solicitors
• Has competed against 44 contractors in 47 bidding packages, won 17 packages, lost 21 packages, 7 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 2 contractors in 2 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 0 packages, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.