Search for information of the inviting party
Information of the Bid solicitor
Agency code
Z084077
Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)
vn2300329952
Complete Name of the Unit

CÔNG TY TNHH KỸ THƯƠNG ĐÔNG ĐÔ

English name
Dong Do Technichcal & Commercial Company Limited
Business Registration ID
2300329952
Address
Khu công nghiệp Lâm Bình, Lâm Thao Commune, Lương Tài District, Bắc Ninh
Address (After merge)
Khu công nghiệp Lâm Bình, Xã Lâm Thao, Bắc Ninh
Phone number (Old MSC)
02223645656
Fax number (Old MSC)
Tax ID
2300329952
Date of issue
21/04/2008
Issuing Nation
Việt Nam
Legal type
Limited liability company with two or more members
Representative
TRẦN THỊ THỦY
Position
manager
Date of approval for registration request
07/11/2019
Role status
Active
This Bid solicitor is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for the contractor Dong Do Technichcal & Commercial Company Limited are as follows:
  • Participated in 11 bidding packages, of which 9 were won, 2 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 99% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 99.9% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Bắc Ninh (11)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Bắc Ninh (6), Undefined (5)
  • Has relationships with 3 Bid Solicitors
  • Has relationships with 3 Bid Investors
  • Has competed against 3 contractors in 3 bidding packages, won 1 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 12 contractors in 10 bidding packages, won 8 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
  • Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
Inviting party's rating score
The above scores and rankings are analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which inviting party's capability is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the inviting party... To better understand the scoring criteria, please refer to the following article: Indicator set for evaluating the capability of the inviting party
Evaluation criteria Evaluation score
Experience
???
Financial capacity
???
Transparency of the investor/bidder
???
Bidding efficiency
???
You need to Login or Register to view bidder rating scores.
Views: 192
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second