Search for information of the inviting party

Information of the Bid solicitor
Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)
vn8472702800
Complete Name of the Unit

NGUYỄN ANH TUẤN

Business Registration ID
8472702800
Address before merge
Address after merge
Tax ID
8472702800
Date of issue
22/03/2017
Issuing Nation
Việt Nam
Legal type
Other Form
Representative
NGUYỄN ANH TUẤN
Position
manager
Date of approval for registration request
18/01/2023
Role status
Active

This Bid solicitor is also an investor. The analysis results of data for the investor NGUYỄN ANH TUẤN are as follows:

  • Is the investor of 2 development investment projects.
  • Is the investor of 0 contractor selection plans, of which 0 were self-published, and 0 were published by other entities.
  • Is the investor of 0 Tender Notices, of which 0 were self-invited, and 0 were invited by other entities.
DauThau.info software reads from the national bidding database
This Bid solicitor is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for the contractor NGUYỄN ANH TUẤN are as follows:
  • Participated in 62 bidding packages, of which 60 were won, 2 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 80.69% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 95.18% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Thái Nguyên (34), Bắc Ninh (7), Lào Cai (5), Tuyên Quang (3), Hải Phòng (3), Phú Thọ (2), Hà Nội (2), Lạng Sơn (1), Undefined (5)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Thái Nguyên (25), Bắc Kạn (9), Bắc Giang (7), Yên Bái (5), Tuyên Quang (3), Hải Dương (3), Hòa Bình (2), Hà Nội (2), Lạng Sơn (1), Undefined (5)
  • Has relationships with 33 Bid Solicitors
  • Has competed against 8 contractors in 12 bidding packages, won 10 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 2 contractors in 3 bidding packages, won 3 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
  • Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
Inviting party's rating score
The above scores and rankings are analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which inviting party's capability is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the inviting party... To better understand the scoring criteria, please refer to the following article: Indicator set for evaluating the capability of the inviting party
Evaluation criteria Evaluation score
Experience
???
Financial capacity
???
Transparency of the investor/bidder
???
Bidding efficiency
???
You need to Login or Register to view bidder rating scores.
Views: 77
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second