Tổng công ty Điện lực miền Bắc

This Bid solicitor is also an investor. The analysis results of data for the investor Northern Power Corporation are as follows:

• Is the investor of 0 development investment projects.
• Is the investor of 0 contractor selection plans, of which 0 were self-published, and 0 were published by other entities.
• Is the investor of 1 Tender Notices, of which 0 were self-invited, and 1 were invited by other entities.

• Participated in 276 bidding packages, of which 268 were won, 8 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 12.38% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 94.2% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hưng Yên (72), Thái Nguyên (30), Lào Cai (14), Sơn La (13), Bắc Ninh (12), Nghệ An (11), Lai Châu (9), Điện Biên (8), Phú Thọ (7), Thanh Hoá (6), Hải Phòng (5), Ninh Bình (5), Hà Tĩnh (5), Tuyên Quang (4), Lạng Sơn (4), Quảng Ninh (3), Cao Bằng (2), Quảng Ngãi (1), Hà Nội (1), Quảng Trị (1), Undefined (63)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Thái Bình (33), Hưng Yên (27), Bắc Kạn (25), Sơn La (13), Lào Cai (11), Nghệ An (11), Lai Châu (9), Điện Biên (8), Bắc Giang (8), Thanh Hoá (6), Hà Tĩnh (5), Bắc Ninh (4), Thái Nguyên (4), Vĩnh Phúc (4), Lạng Sơn (4), Quảng Ninh (3), Hải Phòng (2), Hà Nam (2), Tuyên Quang (2), Hải Dương (2), Cao Bằng (2), Quảng Ngãi (1), Yên Bái (1), Nam Định (1), Hà Nội (1), Quảng Trị (1), Hà Giang (1), Phú Thọ (1), Undefined (84)
• Has relationships with 92 Bid Solicitors
• Has relationships with 118 Bid Investors
• Has competed against 36 contractors in 23 bidding packages, won 15 packages, lost 8 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 35 contractors in 40 bidding packages, won 34 packages, lost 6 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 235 bidding packages with 39 roles.