Search for information of the inviting party

Information of the Bid solicitor
Agency code
1008547
Agency name (full)

Tổng công ty Lương thực Miền Nam

Abbreviations
VINAFOOD II
English name
VIETNAM SOUTHERN FOOD CORPORATTION
Business Registration ID
0300613198
Subclasses
Other
Type of agency
Big
Address before merge
42 Chu Mạnh Trinh, phường Bến Nghé, 1 District, Hà Nội
Address after merge
Phone number (Old MSC)
(08)38223639
Fax number (Old MSC)
(08)38292344
Webpage
http://www.vinafood2.com.vn
Tax ID
0300613198
Approval time
06/12/2010
This Bid solicitor is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for the contractor VIETNAM SOUTHERN FOOD CORPORATION - JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
  • Participated in 150 bidding packages, of which 64 were won, 86 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 79.99% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 94.18% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Đà Nẵng (25), Gia Lai (20), Quảng Ngãi (16), Hải Phòng (12), Lâm Đồng (10), Tây Ninh (9), Đắk Lắk (8), Nghệ An (8), Khánh Hòa (8), Ninh Bình (7), Hà Nội (5), Hưng Yên (5), An Giang (3), Thanh Hoá (3), Huế (3), Cần Thơ (2), Quảng Trị (2), Hà Tĩnh (2), Đồng Tháp (2)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Bình Định (11), Long An (9), Nghệ An (8), Quảng Nam (7), Hải Phòng (6), Đà Nẵng (5), Kon Tum (5), Phú Yên (5), Quảng Ngãi (5), Hà Nội (5), Gia Lai (4), Ninh Bình (4), Kiên Giang (3), Thanh Hoá (3), Huế (3), Hà Nam (3), Ninh Thuận (3), Bình Thuận (3), Cần Thơ (2), Quảng Trị (2), Hà Tĩnh (2), Undefined (52)
  • Has relationships with 15 Bid Solicitors
  • Has competed against 51 contractors in 147 bidding packages, won 61 packages, lost 86 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 0 contractors in 0 bidding packages, won 0 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
  • Participated in consulting for 26 bidding packages with 9 roles.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
Inviting party's rating score
The above scores and rankings are analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which inviting party's capability is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the inviting party... To better understand the scoring criteria, please refer to the following article: Indicator set for evaluating the capability of the inviting party
Evaluation criteria Evaluation score
Experience
???
Financial capacity
???
Transparency of the investor/bidder
???
Bidding efficiency
???
You need to Login or Register to view bidder rating scores.
Views: 45
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second