TRUNG TÂM TIN HỌC

This Bid solicitor is also an investor. The analysis results of data for the investor COMPUTER SCIENCE CENTER are as follows:

• Is the investor of 0 development investment projects.
• Is the investor of 3 contractor selection plans, of which 3 were self-published, and 0 were published by other entities.
• Is the investor of 0 Tender Notices, of which 0 were self-invited, and 0 were invited by other entities.

• Participated in 42 bidding packages, of which 39 were won, 2 were lost, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 59.92% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 108.02% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Cà Mau (10), Cần Thơ (9), Đồng Nai (2), Đồng Tháp (2), Gia Lai (2), Lâm Đồng (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Tây Ninh (1), Vĩnh Long (1), Undefined (13)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Cà Mau (9), Sóc Trăng (7), Đồng Nai (2), Hậu Giang (2), Tiền Giang (2), Bình Định (2), Đắk Nông (1), Quảng Nam (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Long An (1), Bến Tre (1), Undefined (13)
• Has relationships with 21 Bid Solicitors
• Has relationships with 18 Bid Investors
• Has competed against 13 contractors in 9 bidding packages, won 7 packages, lost 2 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 0 contractors in 0 bidding packages, won 0 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 4 bidding packages with 1 roles.