Trung tâm Công nghệ - Chính phủ số

This Bid solicitor is also an investor. The analysis results of data for the investor Center of Technology - Digital Government are as follows:

• Is the investor of 0 development investment projects.
• Is the investor of 1 contractor selection plans, of which 1 were self-published, and 0 were published by other entities.
• Is the investor of 0 Tender Notices, of which 0 were self-invited, and 0 were invited by other entities.

• Participated in 298 bidding packages, of which 278 were won, 10 were lost, 7 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
• Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

  Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

• Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
• Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
• Lowest bid rate when participating: 52.54% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 98.59% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
• Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (101), Bắc Ninh (20), Quảng Ngãi (10), Đồng Nai (8), Tây Ninh (8), Đà Nẵng (7), Hải Phòng (7), Lạng Sơn (5), Phú Thọ (4), Đắk Lắk (4), Quảng Ninh (3), Cần Thơ (2), Tuyên Quang (2), Vĩnh Long (2), Thái Nguyên (2), Ninh Bình (2), Nationwide (2), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (1), Hưng Yên (1), Lai Châu (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Lâm Đồng (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Huế (1), Cà Mau (1), Lào Cai (1), Undefined (100)
• Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (101), Bắc Giang (12), Đồng Nai (8), Quảng Ngãi (7), Hải Phòng (7), Long An (6), Lạng Sơn (5), Quảng Nam (4), Quảng Ninh (3), Bắc Ninh (3), Vĩnh Phúc (2), Hà Giang (2), Trà Vinh (2), Đắk Lắk (2), Ninh Bình (2), Phú Yên (2), Phú Thọ (2), Cần Thơ (1), Bình Dương (1), Hậu Giang (1), Thái Bình (1), Thái Nguyên (1), Lai Châu (1), Đồng Tháp (1), Bình Thuận (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Huế (1), Bạc Liêu (1), Lào Cai (1), Undefined (116)
• Has relationships with 102 Bid Solicitors
• Has relationships with 124 Bid Investors
• Has competed against 33 contractors in 75 bidding packages, won 57 packages, lost 10 packages, 5 are pending results, and 3 were canceled.
• Has collaborated with 17 contractors in 73 bidding packages, won 59 packages, lost 7 packages, 5 are pending results, and 2 were canceled.
• Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
• Participated in consulting for 89 bidding packages with 25 roles.