Search for information of the inviting party
Information of the Bid solicitor
Agency code
Z011685
Agency name (full)

Viện bảo tồn di tích

Business Registration ID
0100122379
Subclasses
Non-profit organization
Type of agency
Big
Address
489 Nguyễn Trãi, Thanh Xuân District, Hà Nội
Address (After merge)
Phone number (Old MSC)
0438544418
Fax number (Old MSC)
0435527296
Tax ID
0100122379
Approval time
01/10/2014
This Bid solicitor is also a contractor. The results of data analysis for the contractor Viện Bảo tồn di tích are as follows:
  • Participated in 52 bidding packages, of which 51 were won, 0 were lost, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
  • Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)

    Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.

  • Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
  • Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
  • Lowest bid rate when participating: 96.8% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 99.52% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
  • Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (21), Quảng Ninh (5), Gia Lai (5), Ninh Bình (4), Khánh Hòa (4), An Giang (3), Lạng Sơn (2), Phú Thọ (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Vĩnh Long (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Quảng Ngãi (1), Hải Phòng (1), Undefined (1)
  • Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (21), Quảng Ninh (5), Bình Định (5), An Giang (3), Lạng Sơn (2), Ninh Bình (2), Phú Thọ (1), Đà Nẵng (1), Vĩnh Long (1), Thanh Hoá (1), Bắc Ninh (1), Hà Nam (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Quảng Ngãi (1), Undefined (6)
  • Has relationships with 24 Bid Solicitors
  • Has relationships with 29 Bid Investors
  • Has competed against 22 contractors in 13 bidding packages, won 12 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
  • Has collaborated with 27 contractors in 17 bidding packages, won 16 packages, lost 0 packages, 0 are pending results, and 1 were canceled.
  • Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
  • Participated in consulting for 3 bidding packages with 3 roles.
The DauThau.info software compiles and analyzes information from the national bidding database
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
Inviting party's rating score
The above scores and rankings are analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which inviting party's capability is stronger or weaker. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package, the reputation of the inviting party... To better understand the scoring criteria, please refer to the following article: Indicator set for evaluating the capability of the inviting party
Evaluation criteria Evaluation score
Experience
???
Financial capacity
???
Transparency of the investor/bidder
???
Bidding efficiency
???
You need to Login or Register to view bidder rating scores.
Views: 10
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second