Construction supervision

Watching

Project Contractor selection plan Tender notice Bid Opening Result Bid award

Tender ID

IB2500521425-02

Views

Contractor selection plan ID

PL2500296535

Bidding package name

Construction supervision

Investor

Ban Quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng khu vực 4

Bidding method

Online bidding

Tender value

1.014.878.787 VND

Publication date

15:14 26/12/2025

Contract Type

All in One

Domestic/ International

Domestic

Contractor Selection Method

Single Stage Two Envelopes

Fields

Consulting

Approval ID

996/QĐ-BQLDAKV4

Approval Documents

Downloading files directly on the new Public Procurement System requires a computer using Windows operating system and installing Client Agent software (Linux and MacOS operating systems cannot install Client software yet). Therefore, to be able to download files on smartphones, tablets or computers using operating systems other than Windows, you need to use DauThau.info software to download files.
To download, please Login or Register

Approval documents

IB2500521425_QuyetDinhPheDuyetKQLCNT_26_12_2025.pdf

E-HSDT Evaluation Report

BCDG GS KE SONG CAN LOC1.pdf

Approval documents

IB2500521425_QuyetDinhPheDuyetKQLCNT_26_12_2025.pdf

E-HSDT Evaluation Report

BCDG GS KE SONG CAN LOC1.pdf

Files with this icon are not supported by the public procurement system for direct download in normal mode. Visit DauThau.info and select Quick Download mode to download the file if you do not use Windows with Agent. DauThau.info supports downloading on most modern browsers and devices!
In case it is discovered that the BMT does not fully attach the E-HSMT file and design documents, the contractor is requested to immediately notify the Investor or the Authorized Person at the address specified in Chapter II-Data Table in E- Application form and report to the Procurement News hotline: 02437.686.611

Decision-making agency

Regional Construction Investment Project Management Board 4

Approval date

26/12/2025

Tendering result

There is a winning contractor

List of successful bidders

Number	Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)	Consortium Name	Contractor's name	Bid price	Technical score	Winning price	Delivery time (days)	Contract date
1	vn1201139934	LIÊN DANH KÈ SÔNG CẦN LỘC	CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN THANH THÀNH HIẾU	902.070.000 VND	89.2	902.070.000 VND	360 day
2	vn1300107997	LIÊN DANH KÈ SÔNG CẦN LỘC	BENTRE CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT JOINT STOCK COMPANY	902.070.000 VND	89.2	902.070.000 VND	360 day

The system analyzed and found the following joint venture contractors:

#	Contractor's name	Role
1	CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN THANH THÀNH HIẾU	main consortium
2	BENTRE CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT JOINT STOCK COMPANY	sub-partnership

List of unsuccessful bidders:

Number	Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)	Contractor's name	Reason for failure
1	vn0310858655	EPSAN TECHNICAL JOINT STOCK COMPANY	Technical score 94.9/100 points. However, the Contractor's E-Proposal does not meet the minimum score requirements in the specific E-HSMT: The contractor's score in Section 3. Solutions and methodology in Table No. 01 - Section 2. Technical evaluation standards - Chapter III: Bid evaluation standards is: 24.9 points > 21 points (minimum score), however, it does not meet the requirements of the E-HSMT (because in Section 3.2 Approach and methodology the contractor has a total score of 4.1 points < 5.6 points (minimum score)), specifically: - In section 3.2.1, the contractor is rated: 0 points, reason: * The contractor does not present a solution for monitoring the work contents of the bidding package as follows: + Construction of guide deck: guide deck (when driving test piles, mass piles, anchor piles, up and down berth piles) + Construction of drainage part (trench cover): concrete, reinforcement, installation of components,... + Construction of 02 loading and unloading berths: the contractor did not present specific methods for supervising piling construction; Formwork – reinforcement – concrete (beams, floors, etc.) - In section 3.2.2, the contractor is evaluated: 2.1 points - In section 3.2.3, the contractor is evaluated: 2 points.
2	vn0309116803	NEW TECHNOLOGY TRADING SERVICE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED	Technical score 87.0/100 points. However, the Contractor's E-Proposal does not meet the minimum score requirements in the specific E-HSMT: The contractor has points in Section 3. Solutions and methodology in Table No. 01 - Section 2. Technical evaluation standards - Chapter III: Bid evaluation standards are: 22 points > 21 points (minimum score), but do not meet the requirements of E-HSMT, specifically: + In Section 3.1 Understand clearly the purpose of the bidding package, the contractor has a total score of 3.4 points < 4.2 points (minimum score): - In section 3.1.1, the contractor is evaluated: 0 points, reason: The contractor explains that the content of the purpose of the bidding package is not appropriate, the presenter states "b. Purpose of the bidding package: * Purpose of the bidding package: Select a consultant that meets the requirements of capacity and experience to carry out construction supervision consultancy for the project: Ong Tri canal embankment (phase 2). in accordance with current legal regulations" - In section 3.1.2, the contractor is evaluated: 2 points - In section 3.1.2, the contractor is evaluated: 1.4 points. + In Section 3.2 Approach and methodology, the contractor has a total score of 4.1 points < 5.6 points (minimum score): - In section 3.2.1, the contractor is rated: 0 points, reason: The contractor does not specifically present the monitoring solution for each construction item of the project (The content of the construction scale of each item is different, so the solution for monitoring works such as: concrete work, formwork, reinforcement, etc. for construction of floors, columns, beams, etc., the contractor must specifically present the monitoring solution for each work item. such as: new construction of embankments, boarding wharfs, ship moorings,...) - In section 3.2.2, the contractor is evaluated: 2.1 points - In section 3.2.3, the contractor is evaluated: 2 points.
3	vn0313642372	DUC KIEN CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT COMPANY LIMITED	Technical score 91.4/100 points. However, the Contractor's E-Proposal does not meet the minimum score requirements in the specific E-HSMT: The contractor's score in Section 3. Solutions and methodology in Table No. 01 - Section 2. Technical evaluation standards - Chapter III: Bid evaluation standards is: 21.4 points > 21 points (minimum score), however, it does not meet the requirements of the E-HSMT (because in Section 3.2 Approach and methodology the contractor has a total score of 2.1 points < 5.6 points (minimum score)), specifically: - In section 3.2.1, the contractor is rated: 0 points, reason: * The contractor presented inappropriate labor safety and environmental safety monitoring content, specifically: + Circular 04/2017/TT-BXD has expired and is replaced by Circular 10/2021/TT-BXD dated August 25, 2021 of the Ministry of Construction. * The contractor presented inappropriate fire and explosion prevention and control monitoring content, specifically: + The Contractor is based on the "Law on Fire Prevention and Fighting (amended and supplemented 2013)", according to which the 2013 Law has expired and is replaced by the Law on Fire Prevention, Fighting and Rescue No. 55/2024/QH15 promulgated by the National Assembly on November 29, 2024 and effective on July 1, 2025. * The contractor does not present a solution for monitoring the work contents of the bidding package as follows: + Construction of guide deck: guide deck (when driving test piles, mass piles, anchor piles, up and down berth piles) + Construction of drainage part (trench cover): concrete, reinforcement, installation of components,... - In section 3.2.2, the contractor is evaluated: 2.1 points - In section 3.2.3, the contractor is rated: 0 points, reason: The contractor does not demonstrate how to perform the job well according to the requirements of the E-HSMT.

List of goods

Number	Menu of goods	Goods code	Amount	Calculation Unit	Description	Origin	Price/Winning bid price/Bidding price (VND)	Note

Giám sát thi công xây dựng dự án Kè sông Cần Lộc, dẫn chiếu đến yêu cầu nêu tại Điều khoản tham chiếu tại Chương V

Part/lot information:

Number	Part/lot code	Part/lot name	Lot price (VND)	Total price of goods (VND)	Delivery time (days)

List of unsuccessful bidders:

Number	Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)	Contractor's name	Reason for failure	Delivery time (days)

List of goods:

Number	Menu of goods	Goods code	Brand	Goods code	Manufacturer	Amount	Calculation Unit	Description	Origin	Price/Winning bid price/Bidding price (VND)	into money	Note

You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second

Construction supervision

CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN THANH THÀNH HIẾU

BENTRE CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT JOINT STOCK COMPANY