Construction supervision and equipment installation

Watching

Project Contractor selection plan Tender notice Bid Opening Result Bid award

Tender ID

IB2500562669-01

Views

Contractor selection plan ID

PL2500322601

Bidding package name

Construction supervision and equipment installation

Investor

Ban Quản lý dự án đầu tư xây dựng khu vực 4

Bidding method

Online bidding

Tender value

898.118.243 VND

Publication date

14:56 12/01/2026

Contract Type

All in One

Domestic/ International

Domestic

Contractor Selection Method

Single Stage Two Envelopes

Fields

Consulting

Approval ID

26/QĐ-BQLDAKV4

Approval Documents

Downloading files directly on the new Public Procurement System requires a computer using Windows operating system and installing Client Agent software (Linux and MacOS operating systems cannot install Client software yet). Therefore, to be able to download files on smartphones, tablets or computers using operating systems other than Windows, you need to use DauThau.info software to download files.
To download, please Login or Register

Approval documents

IB2500562669_QuyetDinhPheDuyetKQLCNT_12_01_2026.pdf

E-HSDT Evaluation Report

BCĐG-TVGS-Trường Long BÌnh Điền.pdf

Approval documents

IB2500562669_QuyetDinhPheDuyetKQLCNT_12_01_2026.pdf

E-HSDT Evaluation Report

BCĐG-TVGS-Trường Long BÌnh Điền.pdf

Files with this icon are not supported by the public procurement system for direct download in normal mode. Visit DauThau.info and select Quick Download mode to download the file if you do not use Windows with Agent. DauThau.info supports downloading on most modern browsers and devices!
In case it is discovered that the BMT does not fully attach the E-HSMT file and design documents, the contractor is requested to immediately notify the Investor or the Authorized Person at the address specified in Chapter II-Data Table in E- Application form and report to the Procurement News hotline: 02437.686.611

Decision-making agency

Regional Construction Investment Project Management Board 4

Approval date

12/01/2026

Tendering result

There is a winning contractor

List of successful bidders

Number	Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)	Consortium Name	Contractor's name	Bid price	Technical score	Winning price	Delivery time (days)	Contract date
1	vn1201139934		CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN THANH THÀNH HIẾU	869.550.000 VND	98.8	869.550.000 VND	330 day

List of unsuccessful bidders:

Number	Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)	Contractor's name	Reason for failure
1	vn1500971072	CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN HATECCO	Technical score 91.6/100 points. However, the Contractor's E-Proposal does not meet the minimum score requirements in the specific E-HSMT: The contractor has points in Section 3. Solutions and methodology in Table No. 01 - Section 2. Technical evaluation standards - Chapter III: Bid evaluation standards are: 22.5 points > 21 points (minimum score), but do not meet the requirements of the E-HSMT, specifically: a. In Section 3.2 Approach and methodology, the contractor has a total score of 4.1 points < 5.6 points (minimum score): - In section 3.2.1, the contractor is rated: 0 points, reason: The contractor does not specifically present the monitoring solution for each construction item in the project (The content of the construction scale of each item is different, so the solution for monitoring works such as: concrete work, formwork, reinforcement,... for the construction of columns, beams, floors,... the contractor must specifically present the supervision solution for each work item such as: constructing new classroom blocks, renovating existing blocks, sub-items, etc.). Furthermore, the contractor did not present supervision solutions for tasks such as: construction of cajuput piles, construction of matic baits, installation of purlins - corrugated iron roofing, ceiling construction, installation of sanitary equipment, internet network system, etc. - In section 3.2.2, the contractor is evaluated: 2.1 points - In section 3.2.3, the contractor is evaluated: 2.0 points. b. In Section 3.6 Personnel arrangement, the contractor has a total score of 3 points < 5.6 points (minimum score): - In Section 3.6.1, the contractor is evaluated: 3 points - In Section 3.6.2, the contractor is evaluated: 0 points, reason: In the content on pages 211, 212, 213 of the file "MAU 06 PP LUAN GS TRUONG MN LONG BINH DIEN" the contractor presents "2. Supervisors in all fields: Carry out continuous supervision throughout 300 days" which is not consistent with the tables and charts of personnel arranged to implement the bidding package (charts and tables). Contractor represents mobilization supervisor positions with a duration of 330 days)
2	vn1700113360	CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TƯ VẤN XÂY DỰNG KIÊN GIANG	Technical score 93.2/100 points. However, the Contractor's E-Proposal does not meet the minimum score requirements in the specific E-HSMT: The contractor has points in Section 3. Solutions and methodology in Table No. 01 - Section 2. Technical evaluation standards - Chapter III: Bid evaluation standards are: 23.2 points > 21 points (minimum score), but do not meet the requirements of E-HSMT, specifically: In Section 3.2 Approach and methodology, the contractor has a total score of 2.1 points < 5.6 points (minimum score): - In section 3.2.1, the contractor is rated: 0 points, reason: + The contractor does not specifically present the supervision solution for each construction item of the project (The scale of construction items is different, so the solution for monitoring works such as: concrete work, formwork, reinforcement, etc. for the construction of columns, beams, floors, etc., the contractor must specifically present the supervision solution for each work item such as: new construction of classroom blocks, renovation of existing blocks, etc.). + The contractor presents the content of acceptance work according to Circular No. 04/2019/TT-BXD dated August 16, 2019, which has expired and has been replaced by Circular 10/2021/TT-BXD dated August 25, 2021. + The contractor presented that the supervision of construction of reinforced concrete parts (supervision of construction of the body and completion on pages 98, 122 of file "3. PPL Long Binh Dien") is not suitable according to current regulations: The basis for supervision of construction of the contractor applies according to TCXDVN 391:2007: Heavy concrete. Natural moisturizing maintenance requirement, expired on January 1, 2012 and was replaced by TCVN 8828:2011. Concrete – Requires maintenance. + The contractor presented that the construction supervision of the pipe installation part (construction supervision of the roof drainage system, construction supervision of the water supply and drainage system, on page number 119,187 of file "3. PPL Long Binh Dien") is not suitable according to current regulations: Basis for construction supervision of the contractor...(For details, please see the attached Evaluation Report) Due to the bidding network system controlling the number of words.
3	vn1101247319	HUNG PHAT CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING COMPANY LIMITED	Technical score 94.4/100 points. However, the Contractor's E-Proposal does not meet the minimum score requirements in the specific E-HSMT: The contractor's points in Section 3. Solutions and methodology in Table No. 01 - Section 2. Technical evaluation standards - Chapter III: Bid evaluation standards are: 26.8 points > 21 points (minimum score), but do not meet the requirements of the E-HSMT, specifically: In Section 3.1 Understanding the purpose of the bidding package, the contractor has a total score: 4 points < 4.2 points (minimum score): - In section 3.1.1, the contractor is evaluated: 0 points, reason: The contractor presented the content "There is a low voltage power line running through the area/needs to be relocated (depending on the decision of the Project Investor)" on page 73 of the file "PPL_TRUONG_MN_LONG_BINH_DIEN" as not having a clear understanding of the scope and scale of the bidding package stated in the terms of reference (According to Decision No. 763/QD-UBND dated April 8, 2025 of the People's Committee of Tien Giang province on project approval, the content of the Decision does not show the item of electric pole relocation and the project also does not have low voltage power lines running through the construction area). Furthermore, the contractor presents the content of inspection and supervision of construction preparation work in Section B. Explanation of the content of supervision of construction work on page 87 of the file "PPL_TRUONG_MN_LONG_BINH_DIEN": The construction unit must coordinate with the Investor to relocate and clear architectural works located within the roadbed before proceeding with construction, which is not consistent with the scale of implementation of the construction package. (Based on the approved Estimates and Drawings released on the national bidding network system (https://muasamcong.mpi.gov.vn, TBMT code: IB2500562669-01), this is a civil project carried out on the school campus and there are no architectural works within the roadbed. → Therefore, the contractor's presentation of the above contents is inappropriate and it is found that the contractor does not clearly understand the purpose of implementing this bidding package. - In section 3.1.2, the contractor is evaluated: 2.0 points - In section 3.1.3, the contractor is evaluated: 2.0 points

Part/lot information:

Number	Part/lot code	Part/lot name	Lot price (VND)	Total price of goods (VND)	Delivery time (days)

List of unsuccessful bidders:

Number	Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System)	Contractor's name	Reason for failure	Delivery time (days)

List of goods:

Number	Menu of goods	Goods code	Brand	Goods code	Manufacturer	Amount	Calculation Unit	Description	Origin	Price/Winning bid price/Bidding price (VND)	into money	Note

You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second

Construction supervision and equipment installation

CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN THANH THÀNH HIẾU