Contact Us
- 0904.634.288, 024.8888.4288
- [email protected]
- Facebook Fanpage: http://fb.com/dauthau.info
- Messenger: http://m.me/dauthau.info
Downloading files directly on the new Public Procurement System requires a computer using Windows operating system and installing Client Agent software (Linux and MacOS operating systems cannot install Client software yet). Therefore, to be able to download files on smartphones, tablets or computers using operating systems other than Windows, you need to use DauThau.info software to download files.
To download, please Login or Register
| Number | Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System) | Consortium Name | Contractor's name | Bid price | Technical score | Winning price | Delivery time (days) | Contract date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vn2800989259 | Liên danh Công ty cổ phần Phú Thắng và Công ty TNHH Một thành viên BCA - Thăng Long |
PHU THANG JOINT STOCK COMPANY |
12.877.882.596,39 VND | 12.643.739.276 VND | 180 day | ||
| 2 | vn0100110856 | Liên danh Công ty cổ phần Phú Thắng và Công ty TNHH Một thành viên BCA - Thăng Long |
BCA THANGLONG ONE MEMBER COMPANY LIMITED |
12.877.882.596,39 VND | 12.643.739.276 VND | 180 day |
| # | Contractor's name | Role |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHU THANG JOINT STOCK COMPANY | main consortium |
| 2 | BCA THANGLONG ONE MEMBER COMPANY LIMITED | sub-partnership |
| Number | Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System) | Consortium Name | Contractor's name | Reason for failure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vn0102614263 | Liên danh STV – Long Sơn | STV VIETNAM CONSTRUCTION JOINT STOCK COMPANY | The contractor is a joint venture but the bid guarantee does not fully meet the commitments prescribed in Form No. 04B Chapter IV - E.HSMT is considered to have conditions that are detrimental to the investor. Ensuring the invalid bidding as prescribed in Section 18.3 E-CDNT. |
| 2 | vn4101503053 | Liên danh Công ty TNHH Đầu tư và Xây dựng Định Bình - Công ty TNHH Tư vấn thiết kế - xây dựng Toàn Đạt (Định Bình - Toàn Đạt) | CÔNG TY TNHH ĐẦU TƯ VÀ XÂY DỰNG ĐỊNH BÌNH | - Regarding the obligation to fulfill the obligation to pay CIT 2024: The contractor attaches to E-Bids of documents to prove that the tax payment obligation has been fulfilled. After comparing the documents, the revenue of the contractor "self -declaration" on the webform MS.08A, the bid solicitor found that the tax amount paid in the documents did not correspond to the payable tax amount (tax revenue * 20% of the CIT) and not enough compared to the payable tax amount shown in the attached financial statements of 2024 attached. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and add documents to have a basis for review and evaluation. The contractor clarifies and supplemented the documents and results: The head of the LD Dinh Binh supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) did not meet the payable tax amount; Members of LD Toan Dat supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) but after the bidding time (after the bid solicitor asked to clarify the new contractor to pay) is not in accordance with the commitment that has made tax payment in the bidding application, failing. - Regarding the same contract: Members of the Joint Venture Satisfy the construction permit of the project "The factory produces wood and metal products, knitting rattan plastic" of the competent authorities (People's Committee of Tay Son District, Binh Dinh Province), but this construction permit does not have information information, not suitable as prescribed in Article 90, Construction Law 50/2014/QH13 so there is no basis for consideration and evaluation. The bid solicitor has evaluated according to the contracts that the contractor declares and the attached documents in E-HSDT, the membership of the all-site of the Toan Dat has no similar contract to meet the requirements after the bid solicitor requests to clarify and supplement. |
| 3 | vn2802305634 | CÔNG TY TNHH THẮNG MẠNH TIẾN | The bidding guarantee of the contractor is signed and stamped by the Deputy Director. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and supplement documents proving the valid signature as prescribed. The contractor does not clarify and guarantee the contractor's bidding is not valid as prescribed in Section 18.3 CDNT Chapter 1 E-HSMT | |
| 4 | vn2801400356 | CÔNG TY TNHH XÂY DỰNG VÀ SẢN XUẤT VẬT LIỆU QUANG VINH | The bidding guarantee of the contractor is signed and stamped by the Deputy Director. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and supplement documents proving the valid signature as prescribed. The contractor does not clarify and guarantee the bidding of the contractor is not valid as prescribed in Section 18.3 CDNT Chapter 1 E-HSMT. | |
| 5 | vn0105674285 | Liên danh STV – Long Sơn | LONG SON INVESTMENT CONSTRUCTION AND CONSULTING COMPANY LIMITED | The contractor is a joint venture but the bid guarantee does not fully meet the commitments prescribed in Form No. 04B Chapter IV - E.HSMT is considered to have conditions that are detrimental to the investor. Ensuring the invalid bidding as prescribed in Section 18.3 E-CDNT. |
| 6 | vn4101404207 | Liên danh Công ty TNHH Đầu tư và Xây dựng Định Bình - Công ty TNHH Tư vấn thiết kế - xây dựng Toàn Đạt (Định Bình - Toàn Đạt) | CÔNG TY TNHH TƯ VẤN THIẾT KẾ - XÂY DỰNG TOÀN ĐẠT | - Regarding the obligation to fulfill the obligation to pay CIT 2024: The contractor attaches to E-Bids of documents to prove that the tax payment obligation has been fulfilled. After comparing the documents, the revenue of the contractor "self -declaration" on the webform MS.08A, the bid solicitor found that the tax amount paid in the documents did not correspond to the payable tax amount (tax revenue * 20% of the CIT) and not enough compared to the payable tax amount shown in the attached financial statements of 2024 attached. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and add documents to have a basis for review and evaluation. The contractor clarifies and supplemented the documents and results: The head of the LD Dinh Binh supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) did not meet the payable tax amount; Members of LD Toan Dat supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) but after the bidding time (after the bid solicitor asked to clarify the new contractor to pay) is not in accordance with the commitment that has made tax payment in the bidding application, failing. - Regarding the same contract: Members of the Joint Venture Satisfy the construction permit of the project "The factory produces wood and metal products, knitting rattan plastic" of the competent authorities (People's Committee of Tay Son District, Binh Dinh Province), but this construction permit does not have information information, not suitable as prescribed in Article 90, Construction Law 50/2014/QH13 so there is no basis for consideration and evaluation. The bid solicitor has evaluated according to the contracts that the contractor declares and the attached documents in E-HSDT, the membership of the all-site of the Toan Dat has no similar contract to meet the requirements after the bid solicitor requests to clarify and supplement. |