Package No. 01: Construction and equipment installation

Tender ID
Views
15
Contractor selection plan ID
Bidding package name
Package No. 01: Construction and equipment installation
Bidding method
Online bidding
Tender value
12.902.380.723 VND
Estimated price
12.887.663.000 VND
Publication date
12:01 22/05/2025
Contract Type
Fixed unit price
Domestic/ International
Domestic
Contractor Selection Method
Single Stage Single Envelope
Fields
Constructions
Approval ID
KQ2500138448_2505221024
Approval Documents

Downloading files directly on the new Public Procurement System requires a computer using Windows operating system and installing Client Agent software (Linux and MacOS operating systems cannot install Client software yet). Therefore, to be able to download files on smartphones, tablets or computers using operating systems other than Windows, you need to use DauThau.info software to download files.
To download, please Login or Register

Files with this icon are not supported by the public procurement system for direct download in normal mode. Visit DauThau.info and select Quick Download mode to download the file if you do not use Windows with Agent. DauThau.info supports downloading on most modern browsers and devices!
In case it is discovered that the BMT does not fully attach the E-HSMT file and design documents, the contractor is requested to immediately notify the Investor or the Authorized Person at the address specified in Chapter II-Data Table in E- Application form and report to the Procurement News hotline: 02437.686.611
Decision-making agency
Vietnam Railway Corporation
Approval date
22/05/2025
Tendering result
There is a winning contractor
List of successful bidders
Number Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System) Consortium Name Contractor's name Bid price Technical score Winning price Delivery time (days) Contract date
1 vn2800989259 Liên danh Công ty cổ phần Phú Thắng và Công ty TNHH Một thành viên BCA - Thăng Long

PHU THANG JOINT STOCK COMPANY

12.877.882.596,39 VND 12.643.739.276 VND 180 day
2 vn0100110856 Liên danh Công ty cổ phần Phú Thắng và Công ty TNHH Một thành viên BCA - Thăng Long

BCA THANGLONG ONE MEMBER COMPANY LIMITED

12.877.882.596,39 VND 12.643.739.276 VND 180 day
The system analyzed and found the following joint venture contractors:
# Contractor's name Role
1 PHU THANG JOINT STOCK COMPANY main consortium
2 BCA THANGLONG ONE MEMBER COMPANY LIMITED sub-partnership
List of unsuccessful bidders:
Number Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System) Consortium Name Contractor's name Reason for failure
1 vn0102614263 Liên danh STV – Long Sơn STV VIETNAM CONSTRUCTION JOINT STOCK COMPANY The contractor is a joint venture but the bid guarantee does not fully meet the commitments prescribed in Form No. 04B Chapter IV - E.HSMT is considered to have conditions that are detrimental to the investor. Ensuring the invalid bidding as prescribed in Section 18.3 E-CDNT.
2 vn4101503053 Liên danh Công ty TNHH Đầu tư và Xây dựng Định Bình - Công ty TNHH Tư vấn thiết kế - xây dựng Toàn Đạt (Định Bình - Toàn Đạt) CÔNG TY TNHH ĐẦU TƯ VÀ XÂY DỰNG ĐỊNH BÌNH - Regarding the obligation to fulfill the obligation to pay CIT 2024: The contractor attaches to E-Bids of documents to prove that the tax payment obligation has been fulfilled. After comparing the documents, the revenue of the contractor "self -declaration" on the webform MS.08A, the bid solicitor found that the tax amount paid in the documents did not correspond to the payable tax amount (tax revenue * 20% of the CIT) and not enough compared to the payable tax amount shown in the attached financial statements of 2024 attached. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and add documents to have a basis for review and evaluation. The contractor clarifies and supplemented the documents and results: The head of the LD Dinh Binh supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) did not meet the payable tax amount; Members of LD Toan Dat supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) but after the bidding time (after the bid solicitor asked to clarify the new contractor to pay) is not in accordance with the commitment that has made tax payment in the bidding application, failing. - Regarding the same contract: Members of the Joint Venture Satisfy the construction permit of the project "The factory produces wood and metal products, knitting rattan plastic" of the competent authorities (People's Committee of Tay Son District, Binh Dinh Province), but this construction permit does not have information information, not suitable as prescribed in Article 90, Construction Law 50/2014/QH13 so there is no basis for consideration and evaluation. The bid solicitor has evaluated according to the contracts that the contractor declares and the attached documents in E-HSDT, the membership of the all-site of the Toan Dat has no similar contract to meet the requirements after the bid solicitor requests to clarify and supplement.
3 vn2802305634 CÔNG TY TNHH THẮNG MẠNH TIẾN The bidding guarantee of the contractor is signed and stamped by the Deputy Director. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and supplement documents proving the valid signature as prescribed. The contractor does not clarify and guarantee the contractor's bidding is not valid as prescribed in Section 18.3 CDNT Chapter 1 E-HSMT
4 vn2801400356 CÔNG TY TNHH XÂY DỰNG VÀ SẢN XUẤT VẬT LIỆU QUANG VINH The bidding guarantee of the contractor is signed and stamped by the Deputy Director. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and supplement documents proving the valid signature as prescribed. The contractor does not clarify and guarantee the bidding of the contractor is not valid as prescribed in Section 18.3 CDNT Chapter 1 E-HSMT.
5 vn0105674285 Liên danh STV – Long Sơn LONG SON INVESTMENT CONSTRUCTION AND CONSULTING COMPANY LIMITED The contractor is a joint venture but the bid guarantee does not fully meet the commitments prescribed in Form No. 04B Chapter IV - E.HSMT is considered to have conditions that are detrimental to the investor. Ensuring the invalid bidding as prescribed in Section 18.3 E-CDNT.
6 vn4101404207 Liên danh Công ty TNHH Đầu tư và Xây dựng Định Bình - Công ty TNHH Tư vấn thiết kế - xây dựng Toàn Đạt (Định Bình - Toàn Đạt) CÔNG TY TNHH TƯ VẤN THIẾT KẾ - XÂY DỰNG TOÀN ĐẠT - Regarding the obligation to fulfill the obligation to pay CIT 2024: The contractor attaches to E-Bids of documents to prove that the tax payment obligation has been fulfilled. After comparing the documents, the revenue of the contractor "self -declaration" on the webform MS.08A, the bid solicitor found that the tax amount paid in the documents did not correspond to the payable tax amount (tax revenue * 20% of the CIT) and not enough compared to the payable tax amount shown in the attached financial statements of 2024 attached. The bid solicitor asked the contractor to clarify and add documents to have a basis for review and evaluation. The contractor clarifies and supplemented the documents and results: The head of the LD Dinh Binh supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) did not meet the payable tax amount; Members of LD Toan Dat supplemented the payment certificate (certified by the tax authority) but after the bidding time (after the bid solicitor asked to clarify the new contractor to pay) is not in accordance with the commitment that has made tax payment in the bidding application, failing. - Regarding the same contract: Members of the Joint Venture Satisfy the construction permit of the project "The factory produces wood and metal products, knitting rattan plastic" of the competent authorities (People's Committee of Tay Son District, Binh Dinh Province), but this construction permit does not have information information, not suitable as prescribed in Article 90, Construction Law 50/2014/QH13 so there is no basis for consideration and evaluation. The bid solicitor has evaluated according to the contracts that the contractor declares and the attached documents in E-HSDT, the membership of the all-site of the Toan Dat has no similar contract to meet the requirements after the bid solicitor requests to clarify and supplement.
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second