XL-01-Complete construction part

Tender ID
Views
20
Contractor selection plan ID
Bidding package name
XL-01-Complete construction part
Bidding method
Online bidding
Tender value
11.132.850.004 VND
Publication date
08:31 02/06/2025
Contract Type
All in One
Domestic/ International
Domestic
Contractor Selection Method
Single Stage Single Envelope
Fields
Constructions
Approval ID
KQ2500166286_2506020802
Approval Documents

Downloading files directly on the new Public Procurement System requires a computer using Windows operating system and installing Client Agent software (Linux and MacOS operating systems cannot install Client software yet). Therefore, to be able to download files on smartphones, tablets or computers using operating systems other than Windows, you need to use DauThau.info software to download files.
To download, please Login or Register

Files with this icon are not supported by the public procurement system for direct download in normal mode. Visit DauThau.info and select Quick Download mode to download the file if you do not use Windows with Agent. DauThau.info supports downloading on most modern browsers and devices!
In case it is discovered that the BMT does not fully attach the E-HSMT file and design documents, the contractor is requested to immediately notify the Investor or the Authorized Person at the address specified in Chapter II-Data Table in E- Application form and report to the Procurement News hotline: 02437.686.611
Decision-making agency
Hong Dan District Construction Investment Project Management Board
Approval date
02/06/2025
Tendering result
There is a winning contractor
List of successful bidders
Number Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System) Consortium Name Contractor's name Bid price Technical score Winning price Delivery time (days) Contract date
1 vn1900441249 Liên danh thi công Gói thầu XL-01

CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN THÀNH KHIÊM

8.861.700.752 VND 8.861.700.752 VND 150 day
2 vn1900574217 Liên danh thi công Gói thầu XL-01

CÔNG TY TRÁCH NHIỆM HỮU HẠN MỘT THÀNH VIÊN NGÂN HÀ KT

8.861.700.752 VND 8.861.700.752 VND 150 day
The system analyzed and found the following joint venture contractors:
List of unsuccessful bidders:
Number Business Registration ID ( on new Public Procuring System) Consortium Name Contractor's name Reason for failure
1 vn1900673031 Liên danh thi công Gói thầu XL-01 CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN ĐẦU TƯ THƯƠNG MẠI XÂY DỰNG LỢI PHÁT * Regarding the same experience in implementing construction contracts: - Contractor of Loi Phat Company: The contractor does not supplement the written confirmation of the investor to prove that the contractor is the subcontractor to build the work. - Toan Thang Company contractor: The value of the contractor's contract has not met the value at the request of E-HSMT. * About personnel: - The contractor does not add documents to prove "experience in similar jobs" or "Experience in similar jobs under the contract" of all employees at the request of E-HSMT. * About equipment: - At the request of E-HSMT: excavators ≥ 0.7m3 (document proving the ownership of the contractor's device (or the lessor); still the test limit). + The contractor proposes that the excavator with a capacity of only 0.4m3 does not meet the requirements of E-HSMT. + The contractor does not supplement, clarify or replace other equipment to meet the requirements of E-HSMT.
2 vn6300248436 Liên danh Nhân nghĩa – Năm Bạn CÔNG TY TNHH MTV XÂY DỰNG THƯƠNG MẠI DỊCH VỤ NHÂN NGHĨA The contractor has results after ranking 2
3 vn2001322099 Liên danh đấu thầu CÔNG TY TNHH XÂY LẮP HT79 * First: Contractor's bids are invalid: -According to the provisions of Section 7, E-HSMT's bidding bidding guarantee stipulates the following content: -The bid guarantee of the contractor proposes the lack of content "At Point b, Clause 18.5". - In this case, the bid is considered to be considered to be disadvantaged for the investor, the bid solicitor according to the provisions of Section 18.3 E-CDNT and the guarantee letter are assessed as invalid. - According to the provisions of "Section 18.3, Chapter I: Contractor Instruction" of E-HSMT, this guarantee is considered to be invalid because "... with conditions that are detrimental to the investor, the bid solicitor (which includes failing to meet the commitments prescribed in Form No. 04a, Form No. 04B Chapter IV) ...". * Second: Part of the evaluation standard specified at "Section 3. Technical evaluation criteria": - Evaluation criteria at "Clause 2. Technical solutions, construction measures": The contractor does not attach drawings to describe the technical solution of construction as required by E-HSMT.
4 vn1900652987 Liên danh thi công Gói thầu XL-01 CÔNG TY TNHH ĐẦU TƯ XÂY DỰNG THƯƠNG MẠI TOÀN THẮNG * Regarding the same experience in implementing construction contracts: - Contractor of Loi Phat Company: The contractor does not supplement the written confirmation of the investor to prove that the contractor is the subcontractor to build the work. - Toan Thang Company contractor: The value of the contractor's contract has not met the value at the request of E-HSMT. * About personnel: - The contractor does not add documents to prove "experience in similar jobs" or "Experience in similar jobs under the contract" of all employees at the request of E-HSMT. * About equipment: - At the request of E-HSMT: excavators ≥ 0.7m3 (document proving the ownership of the contractor's device (or the lessor); still the test limit). + The contractor proposes that the excavator with a capacity of only 0.4m3 does not meet the requirements of E-HSMT. + The contractor does not supplement, clarify or replace other equipment to meet the requirements of E-HSMT.
5 vn6300089987 Liên danh Nhân nghĩa – Năm Bạn CÔNG TY TNHH THƯƠNG MẠI XÂY DỰNG NĂM BẠN The contractor has results after ranking 2
6 vn1900627684 Liên danh đấu thầu CÔNG TY TNHH MỘT THÀNH VIÊN XÂY DỰNG THÚY DUY * First: Contractor's bids are invalid: -According to the provisions of Section 7, E-HSMT's bidding bidding guarantee stipulates the following content: -The bid guarantee of the contractor proposes the lack of content "At Point b, Clause 18.5". - In this case, the bid is considered to be considered to be disadvantaged for the investor, the bid solicitor according to the provisions of Section 18.3 E-CDNT and the guarantee letter are assessed as invalid. - According to the provisions of "Section 18.3, Chapter I: Contractor Instruction" of E-HSMT, this guarantee is considered to be invalid because "... with conditions that are detrimental to the investor, the bid solicitor (which includes failing to meet the commitments prescribed in Form No. 04a, Form No. 04B Chapter IV) ...". * Second: Part of the evaluation standard specified at "Section 3. Technical evaluation criteria": - Evaluation criteria at "Clause 2. Technical solutions, construction measures": The contractor does not attach drawings to describe the technical solution of construction as required by E-HSMT.
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second