Contact Us
- 0904.634.288, 024.8888.4288
- contact@dauthau.asia
- Facebook Fanpage: http://fb.com/dauthau.info
- Messenger: http://m.me/dauthau.info
Mục lục
Search for business information
0100108656 - CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TRAPHACO
Add comparison
Find: 04:11 30/10/2025
37th update Re-update
General contractor information
| Company name | CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TRAPHACO |
|
| International name | TRAPHACO JOINT STOCK COMPANY | |
| Business Tax ID | 0100108656 | |
| Tax ID issue country | Việt Nam | |
| Business Registration ID | vn0100108656 | |
| Head office address after merger | 75 Phố Yên Ninh, Phường Ba Đình, Hà Nội | |
| Company Website | http://info@traphaco.com.vn | |
| Business | Goods | |
| Form of Business | Joint Stock Company | |
| Company Establishment Date | 01/08/2017 | |
| The number of workers | 923 | |
| Date of registration on the Public procurement system | 05/05/2016 | |
| Payment Status | Paid | |
| Legal representative | TRẦN TÚC MÃ | |
| Position | General Director | |
| Attached files |
Adjust business operations Organizational chart Business registration certificate
|
|
| Enterprise scale | Large business/Corporations | |
Business industry of CÔNG TY CỔ PHẦN TRAPHACO |
||
Contractor data analysis results
To view full information
Data analysis results of DauThau.info software for contractors TRAPHACO JOINT STOCK COMPANY are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 1049 bidding packages, of which 954 were won, 87 were lost, 2 are pending results, and 6 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 1.18% in the bidding package here (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 1.52% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (341), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (71), Huế (54), Thanh Hoá (49), Hải Phòng (41), Lào Cai (37), Hưng Yên (34), Nghệ An (33), Quảng Ninh (32), Cần Thơ (26), Đồng Tháp (24), Bắc Ninh (21), Cà Mau (19), Đà Nẵng (17), Đắk Lắk (16), Ninh Bình (14), Thái Nguyên (13), Phú Thọ (12), Khánh Hòa (10), Đồng Nai (9), Vĩnh Long (8), Lạng Sơn (8), Gia Lai (8), Tuyên Quang (7), Lâm Đồng (7), Quảng Ngãi (6), An Giang (5), Tây Ninh (4), (1), Undefined (122)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Hà Nội (341), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (66), Huế (54), Thanh Hoá (49), Lào Cai (37), Thái Bình (34), Nghệ An (33), Quảng Ninh (32), Hải Dương (29), Tiền Giang (21), Sóc Trăng (18), Phú Yên (16), Bạc Liêu (15), Bắc Ninh (15), Đà Nẵng (12), Hải Phòng (11), Hà Nam (11), Thái Nguyên (11), Bình Phước (9), Lạng Sơn (8), Tuyên Quang (7), Bình Thuận (7), Cần Thơ (6), Phú Thọ (6), Trà Vinh (6), Khánh Hòa (6), Vĩnh Phúc (6), Bình Định (6), Bắc Giang (5), Quảng Nam (5), Quảng Ngãi (4), Cà Mau (4), Ninh Thuận (4), Long An (3), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (3), Đồng Tháp (3), Kiên Giang (3), Nam Định (3), Bến Tre (2), Kon Tum (2), An Giang (2), Bình Dương (2), Bắc Kạn (2), Hậu Giang (2), Tây Ninh (1), Undefined (130)
- Has relationships with 454 Bid Solicitors
- Has competed against 1095 contractors in 753 bidding packages, won 659 packages, lost 86 packages, 3 are pending results, and 5 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 3 contractors in 8 bidding packages, won 7 packages, lost 1 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 1 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
- Participated in consulting for 0 bidding packages with 0 roles.
DauThau.info software could not find this business information on National portal for registration business registration
Ability score of the soliciting entity
The above scores and rankings were analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history and business size. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which bidding party's capacity is stronger or weaker or determine the likelihood of winning a bid. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package and the field and industry of each business. To better understand the scoring criteria, see more in the following article: Set of indicators to evaluate the capacity of the bidding party
| Evaluation criteria | Evaluation score |
|---|---|
| Experience | ??? |
| Financial capacity | ??? |
| Competitiveness | ??? |
| Enterprise scale | ??? |
| Violation history | ??? |
To view contractor ability score
Contractor ranking by criteria (Nationwide scope)
This is the contractor's ranking by criteria that DauThau.info software statistics based on bidding history. Note that this statistic may be completely incorrect due to incomplete data collection from the National Bidding Network System.
| Criteria | Value | National ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Total bid packages participated | ??? | ??? |
| Total bid packages won | ??? | ??? |
| Total bid packages failed | ??? | ??? |
| Total winning bidding revenue | ??? | ??? |
To view contractor ranking
Detailed data statistics tables
List of bid packages participated
No.
Bid Package
Bid Value
Time
Result
Contractor role
Province / city
No.: 1
Bid Value: 0
Time: 30/12/2025
Result: Lost
Contractor role: Standalone
Province / city: Hải Phòng
No.: 2
Bid Value: 109.375.000 VND
Time: 12/12/2025
Result: Won
Contractor role: Standalone
Province / city: Hải Phòng
No.: 3
Bid Package:
Procurement of drugs for 3 drug rehabilitation facilities - PC04 Department November and December 2025
Bid Value: 105.042.500 VND
Time: 08/12/2025
Result: Won
Contractor role: Standalone
Province / city: Hải Phòng
List of bid solicitors in which contractors have participated in bidding
No.
Bid Solicitor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
Total winning bid value
Ratio of winning bid price / bid value (*)
No.: 1
Bid Package:
Trung tâm Mua sắm tập trung tỉnh Tiền Giang
No.: 2
Bid Package:
Bệnh viện Đa khoa huyện Quốc Oai
No.: 3
Bid Package:
Trung tâm Y tế quận Hai Bà Trưng
(*)Based only on packages with published estimate or bid price
List of previous competitors
No.
Contractor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
No.: 1
No.: 2
No.: 3
List of joint venture contractors
No.
Contractor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
No.: 1
No.: 2
No.: 3
List of provinces/cities participating in bidding
No.
Province / city
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Total winning bid value
Bids won as a joint venture
Total value of won bids as a joint venture
No.: 1
Province / city: Hà Nội
No.: 2
Province / city: Undefined
No.: 3
Province / city: TP.Hồ Chí Minh
List of violations of the contractor's regulations on bidding
Top contractor who participated the most in the bid
No.
Contractor
Bid Package
NUMBER OF BUSINESSES BY TYPE
Total:
Number of participating contractors by number of bidding packages
There are 68,759 contractor who have not participated in any bidding packages
Top 10 contractors most frequently "investigated" by other contractors
Contractor:TRUONG SON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Contractor:CÔNG TY TNHH MỘT THÀNH VIÊN HM88
Contractor:CÔNG TY TNHH NGỌC KHÁNH
Contractor:TAG VIETNAM GROUP JOINT STOCK COMPANY
Contractor:VIETTEL CONSTRUCTION JOINT STOCK CORPORATION
Contractor who won the most bids
No.
Contractor
Bid Package
No.: 3
Bid Package: 4,207
Contractor who lost the most bids
No.
Contractor
Bid Package
Greeting
You are not logged in, please log in to use our various functions for members.
If you are still not our member, please sign up.You can use your account on DauThau.info to log in to Dauthau.Net, and vice versa!
Only 5 minutes and absolutely free! Your account can be use on all over our ecosystem, including DauThau.info and DauThau.Net.
Search for bid information
Latest news
-
When does contract negotiation fail?
-
[VIDEO] Guide for bid solicitors to Extend the Bid Submission Deadline
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Evaluating Bid Documents on the New National Bidding Network System
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Posting Tender Notices for PPP Projects
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Posting Prequalification Notices for PPP Projects
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Responding to Clarification Requests for e-HSMST (E-Prequalification Invitation Documents) of PPP Projects on the New National Bidding Network System
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Uploading the Shortlist for PPP Projects
-
[VIDEO] Guide for Bid Solicitors to Extend the Prequalification Document Submission Date for PPP Projects
Statistical
- 3,412 Projects are waiting for contractors
- 360 Tender notices posted in the last 24 hours
- 1,145 Contractor selection plan posted in the last 24 hours
- 9,389 Tender notices posted in the past month
- 48,683 Contractor selection plan posted in the last month
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second