Contact Us
- 0904.634.288, 024.8888.4288
- [email protected]
- Facebook Fanpage: http://fb.com/dauthau.info
- Messenger: http://m.me/dauthau.info
Mục lục
Search for business information
0102888232 - Trung tâm Hỗ trợ ra quyết định và Phát triển tài nguyên nước
Add comparison
Find: 09:16 01/09/2026
40th update Re-update
General contractor information
| Company name | Trung tâm Hỗ trợ ra quyết định và Phát triển tài nguyên nước |
|
| International name | CWRDSD | |
| Business Tax ID | 0102888232 | |
| Tax ID issue date | 28/08/2008 | |
| Tax ID issue country | Việt Nam | |
| Business Registration ID | vn0102888232 | |
| Company Address | Tầng 1, Nhà B, Số 28 Đường Phạm Văn Đồng, Phường Nghĩa Đô, City Hà Nội | |
| Form of Business | Administrative units, non-business units | |
| Company Establishment Date | 28/08/2008 | |
| The number of workers | 29 | |
| Date of registration on the Public procurement system | 30/09/2021 | |
| Payment Status | Paid | |
| Legal representative | Nguyễn Văn Đức | |
| Position | Director | |
| Attached files |
Adjust business operations Organizational chart Business registration certificate
|
|
Contractor data analysis results
To view full information
Data analysis results of DauThau.info software for contractors CWRDSD are as follows:
You need to Login or Sign up to view all informations.
- Participated in 55 bidding packages, of which 48 were won, 6 were lost, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Total value of winning bid packages (including joint ventures): VND (In which VND are designated bid packages; VND are bid packages with KQLCNT but no TBMT; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
Note: This is the total value of the bid packages that the contractor has won, including bid packages participating as a joint venture. This figure is calculating the total value of the entire joint venture. Because the participation rate in the joint venture is not announced, we do not have the basis to accurately separate the data for each member of the joint venture. The above figures may be larger than the actual figures that the contractor won.
- Total bid-winning value as an independent party: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is bidding packages not linked to the Contractor Selection Plan)
- Total value of bidding packages participated in and won as a consortium: VND (Of which VND is for designated packages; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice; VND is for packages with contractor selection results but no Tender Notice) (Winning bid value of all consortium members)
- Lowest bid rate when participating: 52.74% in the bidding package here (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Average bid-winning price compared to the estimated price: 89.26% (Only calculated based on packages that have published estimated prices or package prices)
- Provinces after the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Sơn La (3), Đà Nẵng (4), Nghệ An (5), Hà Tĩnh (2), TP.Hồ Chí Minh (4), Lâm Đồng (6), Khánh Hòa (2), Quảng Trị (1), Lào Cai (3), Gia Lai (3), Quảng Ngãi (2), Vĩnh Long (1), Đắk Lắk (3), Tây Ninh (1), Hưng Yên (1), Tuyên Quang (2), Hà Nội (1), Đồng Nai (1), Nationwide (1), Cần Thơ (4), Phú Thọ (1), Undefined (5)
- Provinces before the merger where the contractor has participated in bidding : Sơn La (3), Đà Nẵng (2), Nghệ An (5), Hà Tĩnh (2), Bà Rịa - Vũng Tàu (3), Bình Thuận (3), Ninh Thuận (1), Quảng Trị (1), Lào Cai (2), Gia Lai (2), Kon Tum (1), Trà Vinh (1), Đắk Lắk (1), Tây Ninh (1), Thái Bình (1), Tuyên Quang (2), Hà Nội (1), Đồng Nai (1), Lâm Đồng (2), Yên Bái (1), Nationwide (1), Quảng Nam (1), Hậu Giang (1), Vĩnh Phúc (1), Khánh Hòa (1), Phú Yên (1), Đắk Nông (1), Undefined (14)
- Has relationships with 37 Bid Solicitors
- Has relationships with 42 Bid Investors
- Has competed against 28 contractors in 51 bidding packages, won 45 packages, lost 6 packages, 0 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Has collaborated with 3 contractors in 4 bidding packages, won 3 packages, lost 0 packages, 1 are pending results, and 0 were canceled.
- Received 0 penalty decisions due to violations of bidding regulations.
- Participated in consulting for 1 bidding packages with 1 roles.
This contractor is also a Procuring Entity. The results of data analysis for the procuring entity TRUNG TÂM THẨM ĐỊNH VÀ KIỂM ĐỊNH TÀI NGUYÊN NƯỚC are as follows:
- Published contractor selection plan of 1 project with a total of 3 of bidding packages.
- Invitation to bid 1 package (with 1 Tender Notices), conducting Prequalificatin Notice 0 packages.
- Results of 3 packages announced, canceled bids 0 packages (among the packages above).
- There are 2 packages with results without Tender Notice and Prequalification Notice.
This contractor is also the investor. The results of data analysis for investors TRUNG TÂM THẨM ĐỊNH VÀ KIỂM ĐỊNH TÀI NGUYÊN NƯỚC are as follows:
- As the investor of 0 investment and development projects.
- As the investor of 4 Contractor Selection Plan, including 4 self-published Contractor Selection Plan, 0 Contractor Selection Plan is self-published by the entity. other posted.
- As the investor of 1 bidding package in which the package is self-inviting 1, with 0 the package is owned by the unit. other bidding.
DauThau.info software could not find this business information on National portal for registration business registration
Ability score of the soliciting entity
The above scores and rankings were analyzed by DauThau.info Software based on bidding history and business size. However, this scoring is only relative and cannot accurately determine which bidding party's capacity is stronger or weaker or determine the likelihood of winning a bid. When comparing, you should carefully consider many other factors such as the specific content of the bidding package and the field and industry of each business. To better understand the scoring criteria, see more in the following article: Set of indicators to evaluate the capacity of the bidding party
| Evaluation criteria | Evaluation score |
|---|---|
| Experience | ??? |
| Financial capacity | ??? |
| Competitiveness | ??? |
| Enterprise scale | ??? |
| Violation history | ??? |
To view contractor ability score
Contractor ranking by criteria (Nationwide scope)
This is the contractor's ranking by criteria that DauThau.info software statistics based on bidding history. Note that this statistic may be completely incorrect due to incomplete data collection from the National Bidding Network System.
| Criteria | Value | National ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Total bid packages participated | ??? | ??? |
| Total bid packages won | ??? | ??? |
| Total bid packages failed | ??? | ??? |
| Total winning bidding revenue | ??? | ??? |
To view contractor ranking
Detailed data statistics tables
List of bid packages participated
No.
Bid Package
Bid Value
Time
Result
Contractor role
Province / city
No.: 1
No.: 2
To view full information
List of bid solicitors in which contractors have participated in bidding
No.
Bid Solicitor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
Total winning bid value
Ratio of winning bid price / bid value (*)
No.: 1
No.: 2
Bid Package:
Ban Quản lý Đầu tư và Xây dựng Thủy lợi 7
(*)Based only on packages with published estimate or bid price
List of investors that the contractor attends
No.
Investor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
Total winning bid value
Ratio of winning bid price / bid value (*)
No.: 1
No.: 2
Investor:
Sở Tài nguyên và Môi trường Hà Nội
No.: 3
(*)Based only on packages with published estimate or bid price
List of previous competitors
No.
Contractor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
No.: 1
No.: 2
No.: 3
List of joint venture contractors
No.
Contractor
Total number of bids
Number of winning bids
Number of losing bids
Number of non result bids
Number of cancelled bids
No.: 1
No.: 2
No.: 3
List of provinces/cities participating in bidding
Top contractor who participated the most in the bid
No.
Contractor
Bid Package
NUMBER OF BUSINESSES BY TYPE
Total:
Number of participating contractors by number of bidding packages
There are 71,208 contractor who have not participated in any bidding packages
Top 10 contractors most frequently "investigated" by other contractors
Contractor:CÔNG TY TNHH MỘT THÀNH VIÊN HM88
Contractor:DONG NAM TRADING COMPANY LIMITED
Contractor:TRUONG SON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Contractor:CÔNG TY TNHH NGỌC KHÁNH
Contractor:TAG VIETNAM GROUP JOINT STOCK COMPANY
Contractor who won the most bids
No.
Contractor
Bid Package
Contractor who lost the most bids
No.
Contractor
Bid Package
Greeting
You are not logged in, please log in to use our various functions for members.
If you are still not our member, please sign up.You can use your account on DauThau.info to log in to Dauthau.Net, and vice versa!
Only 5 minutes and absolutely free! Your account can be use on all over our ecosystem, including DauThau.info and DauThau.Net.
Search for bid information
Latest news
-
Detailed instructions on how to deposit money and redeem points on DauThau.info
-
When does contract negotiation fail?
-
[VIDEO] Guide for bid solicitors to Extend the Bid Submission Deadline
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Evaluating Bid Documents on the New National Bidding Network System
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Posting Tender Notices for PPP Projects
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Posting Prequalification Notices for PPP Projects
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Responding to Clarification Requests for e-HSMST (E-Prequalification Invitation Documents) of PPP Projects on the New National Bidding Network System
-
[VIDEO] Guide to Uploading the Shortlist for PPP Projects
Statistical
- 5,534 Projects are waiting for contractors
- 328 Contractor selection plan posted in the last 24 hours
- 13,250 Tender notices posted in the past month
- 49,125 Contractor selection plan posted in the last month
You did not use the site, Click here to remain logged. Timeout: 60 second